Universidad San Sebastián  
 

Repositorio Institucional Universidad San Sebastián

Búsqueda avanzada

Descubre información por...

 

Título

Ver títulos
 

Autor

Ver autores
 

Tipo

Ver tipos
 

Materia

Ver materias

Buscar documentos por...




Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, Juan José
dc.contributor.author Avalos-Díaz, Constanza
dc.contributor.author Droguett-Utreras, Antonia
dc.contributor.author Guerra-Loyola, Javier
dc.contributor.author Nova-Baeza, Pablo
dc.contributor.author Orellana-Donoso, Mathias
dc.contributor.author Suazo-Santibañez, Alejandra
dc.contributor.author Oyanedel-Amaro, Gustavo
dc.contributor.author Sanchis-Gimeno, Juan
dc.contributor.author Bruna-Mejias, Alejandro
dc.contributor.author Chatzioglou, Gkionoul Nteli
dc.date.accessioned 2026-02-08T03:24:16Z
dc.date.available 2026-02-08T03:24:16Z
dc.date.issued 2024-01
dc.identifier.issn 0930-1038
dc.identifier.other Mendeley: d530752d-4276-3c42-a7d1-1a9d3b86e042
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.uss.cl/handle/uss/20284
dc.description Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2024.
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Knowledge of anatomical variants that affect the hepatic duct (HD) are of particular clinical relevance during hepatobiliary surgical procedures. More specifically, the aberrant anatomy of the common HD is the most common anatomical variation affecting the biliary tree. Below, we describe different classifications of anatomical variants that affect this canal. According to Huang’s classification, variations are determined depending on the insertion of the right posterior hepatic duct (RPHD). Materials and methods: Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and LILACS databases were investigated until January 2024. The methodological quality was assessed with an anatomical studies assurance tool (AQUA). Pooled prevalence was estimated using a random effects model. For the subgroup analysis, Student’s T-test was used. Results: The prevalence rate of aberrant hepatic duct (AHD) was 15% (confidence interval [CI] of 7–22%). The first subgroup had cadavers and images. For the cadavers, the prevalence was 15.83% (CI: 11.22–18.3%), while the images had a prevalence of 22.06% (CI: 18.12–25.33%). This subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant difference between these groups (p = 0.127). The second subgroup comprised the continents where the included studies were from. In this subgroup, no statistically significant differences were found (p = 0.613). Finally, regarding the right or left laterality of the HD variant, there were no statistically significant differences (p = 0.089). Conclusion: A AHD corresponds to a finding that can occur in a significant percentage of our society, which could be an accidental discovery during surgeries or present asymptomatically throughout life and be a cadaveric discovery later. We believe it is important for surgeons to have prior knowledge of the possible variants of HD to prevent possible complications during and after surgery. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof vol. 46 Issue: no. 12 Pages: 2027-2047
dc.source Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
dc.title Clinical implications of aberrant anatomy of the common hepatic duct in liver surgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis en
dc.type Artículo
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s00276-024-03494-8
dc.publisher.department Facultad de Ciencias


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem