Universidad San Sebastián  
 

Repositorio Institucional Universidad San Sebastián

Búsqueda avanzada

Descubre información por...

 

Título

Ver títulos
 

Autor

Ver autores
 

Tipo

Ver tipos
 

Materia

Ver materias

Buscar documentos por...




Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Trujillo Jara, Karen
dc.contributor.author Hernandez, Jose Ignacio
dc.contributor.author Mouter, Niek
dc.contributor.author Brouwer, Werner
dc.contributor.author van Exel, Job
dc.date.accessioned 2026-02-08T03:25:24Z
dc.date.available 2026-02-08T03:25:24Z
dc.date.issued 2025-01
dc.identifier.issn 0277-9536
dc.identifier.other ORCID: /0000-0003-0490-4042/work/173567739
dc.identifier.other Mendeley: 5a067a9a-a8b4-347d-984a-12be27a68865
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.uss.cl/handle/uss/20309
dc.description Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors
dc.description.abstract Background: The outbreak of COVID-19 was followed by an unprecedented package of measures to protect public health. Over 150 countries mandated school closures to reduce the risk of transmission. Decisions on whether to close schools involve trade-offs between important effects on public health, learning outcomes, well-being of children, productivity of parents. Objectives: Investigate Peruvian citizens’ preferences for schools opening during a public-health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic in two scenarios: (i) when the threat from COVID-19 is low and schools are open; and, (ii) when the threat from COVID-19 is high and schools are closed. Methods: We conducted a Participatory Value Evaluation (PVE) from 22 September to 17 October 2022, on which 2007 respondents assessed which policy measures to implement in the two scenarios. (i) In Scenario 1 “Schools are open”, children go to school, teachers and parents go to their jobs, but children still experience learning deficits from previous school closures. (ii) In Scenario 2 “Schools are closed”, children cannot go to school and do not receive any formal teaching, leading to learning losses; many teachers must change careers; and, many parents have to stay at home to take care of their children and lose income. Respondents were shown a range of policy measures in each of the scenarios and received information about the effects of each measure on public health, children's well-being and learning loss. Results: We found that most respondents in Scenario 1 preferred mandatory vaccination for teachers and quarantine measures. In Scenario 2 we found that most respondents were positive towards reopening school policies. In both Scenarios respondents prioritized mandatory vaccination and quarantine measures over other mitigation measures. In Scenario 2, most respondents from the Highland region selected opening schools with 100% on-location teaching while hybrid teaching was mostly selected in the Coast region. Most respondents (82%) evaluated PVE as a good method to involve citizens in policy decision-making. Conclusions: Policies that focus on prevention (e.g. mandatory vaccination for teachers and quarantine measures) can count on substantial support in a scenario when schools are open. The strong preference for opening schools with a noticeable difference in the way classes are provided (e.g. teaching on location most preferred by respondents from the Highlands and hybrid teaching by respondents from the Coast) show the importance of introducing differentiated strategies among regions. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof vol. 365 Issue: no. 117581 Pages:
dc.source Social Science and Medicine
dc.title Preferences of citizens in Peru for school opening during a public-health crisis : A participatory value evaluation study en
dc.type Artículo
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117581
dc.publisher.department Facultad de Economía, Negocios y Gobierno


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem