Universidad San Sebastián  
 

Repositorio Institucional Universidad San Sebastián

Búsqueda avanzada

Descubre información por...

 

Título

Ver títulos
 

Autor

Ver autores
 

Tipo

Ver tipos
 

Materia

Ver materias

Buscar documentos por...




Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Pizarro-Mena, Rafael
dc.contributor.author Duran-Aguero, Samuel
dc.contributor.author Causa-Vera, Maria
dc.contributor.author Rios-Duran, Camilo
dc.contributor.author Parra-Soto, Solange
dc.date.accessioned 2026-02-08T03:30:24Z
dc.date.available 2026-02-08T03:30:24Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.identifier.issn 2090-2204
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.uss.cl/handle/uss/20524
dc.description Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2025 Rafael Pizarro-Mena et al. Journal of Aging Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.description.abstract Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted multicomponent face-to-face interventions with older people, which became an opportunity for the implementation of these interventions in telehealth modality, as well as the analysis of the facilitators and barriers. This qualitative study examines the facilitators and barriers, from the users’ perspective, of a promotional–preventive multicomponent intervention in older people using an asynchronous telehealth modality during the COVID-19 pandemic, as a continuation of the face-to-face intervention. Methods: Semistructured in-depth interviews were used. An intentional sampling was conducted over eight groups of older people in a city, who were part of a multicomponent (physical activity, cognitive stimulation, and education) telehealth (videos, infographics, manual, and WhatsApp) promotional–preventive intervention, who came from the same face-to-face intervention. After intervention, two groups were identified (intervention and control). Telephone interviews, until theoretical saturation was reached, were audio-recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti. Results: Twenty-six older people of both sexes, aged 60–88 years, were interviewed (14 intervened and 12 controls). Six themes were identified: positive aspects of telehealth, telehealth facilitators, preference for face-to-face modality over telehealth modality, telehealth barriers, reasons for not performing telehealth, and coping strategies in the pandemic: specifically, as facilitators, participating in the company of others, having participated in the same intervention previously (face-to-face modality), good knowledge of digital literacy, self-motivation, commitment to the program, and the emergence of innate leaders, and as barriers, pain during physical activity, complexity of cognitive exercises included in cognitive stimulation, poor digital literacy, and not having support from others. Conclusion: This is the first qualitative study that identifies facilitators and barriers of a multicomponent intervention in an asynchronous telehealth modality, as a continuation of the same face-to-face intervention. The asynchronous telehealth modality could be used regularly with older people in rural areas, in situations of disability and/or with care needs, pandemic scenarios, or natural disasters. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof vol. 2025 Issue: no. 1 Pages:
dc.source Journal of Aging Research
dc.title Perceived Facilitators and Barriers, From the Perspective of Users, of a Multicomponent Intervention in Older People Using an Asynchronous Telehealth Modality During the COVID-19 Pandemic : A Qualitative Research en
dc.type Artículo
dc.identifier.doi 10.1155/jare/6839569
dc.publisher.department Facultad de Ciencias de la Rehabilitación y Calidad de Vida


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem