Universidad San Sebastián  
 

Repositorio Institucional Universidad San Sebastián

Búsqueda avanzada

Descubre información por...

 

Título

Ver títulos
 

Autor

Ver autores
 

Tipo

Ver tipos
 

Materia

Ver materias

Buscar documentos por...




Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Bergamo, Edmara T.P.
dc.contributor.author Zahoui, Abbas
dc.contributor.author Barrera, Raúl Bravo
dc.contributor.author Huwais, Salah
dc.contributor.author Coelho, Paulo G.
dc.contributor.author Karateew, Edward Dwayne
dc.contributor.author Bonfante, Estevam A.
dc.date.accessioned 2026-02-08T03:33:38Z
dc.date.available 2026-02-08T03:33:38Z
dc.date.issued 2021-06
dc.identifier.issn 1523-0899
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.uss.cl/handle/uss/20668
dc.description Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
dc.description.abstract Background: Osseodensification (OD) has shown to improve implant stability; however, the influences of implant design, dimensions, and surgical site characteristics are unknown. Purpose: To compare the insertion torque (IT) and temporal implant stability quotients (ISQ) of implants placed via OD or subtractive drilling (SD). Materials and Methods: This multicenter controlled clinical trial enrolled 56 patients, whom were in need of at least 2 implants (n = 150 implants). Patients were treated with narrow, regular, or wide implants and short, regular, or long implants in the anterior or posterior region of the maxilla or in the posterior region of the mandible. Osteotomies were performed following manufacturers recommendation. IT was recorded with a torque indicator. ISQ was recorded with resonance frequency analysis immediately after surgery, 3 and 6 weeks. Results: Data complied as a function of osteotomy indicated significantly higher IT for OD relative to SD. OD outperformed conventional SD for all pairwise comparisons of arches (maxilla and mandible) and areas operated (anterior and posterior), diameters and lengths of the implants, except for short implants. Overall, ISQ data also demonstrated significantly higher values for OD compared to SD regardless of the healing period. Relative to immediate readings, ISQ values significantly decreased at 3 weeks, returning to immediate levels at 6 weeks; however, ISQ values strictly remained above 68 throughout healing time for OD. Data as a function of arch operated and osteotomy, area operated and osteotomy, implant dimensions and osteotomy, also exhibited higher ISQ values for OD relative to SD on pairwise comparisons, except for short implants. Conclusions: OD demonstrated higher IT and temporal ISQ values relative to SD, irrespective of arch and area operated as well as implant design and dimension, with an exception for short implants. Future studies should focus on biomechanical parameters and bone level change evaluation after loading. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof vol. 23 Issue: no. 3 Pages: 317-328
dc.source Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
dc.title Osseodensification effect on implants primary and secondary stability : Multicenter controlled clinical trial en
dc.type Artículo
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/cid.13007
dc.publisher.department Facultad de Odontología


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem